Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Dear actors...

Dear actors (and singers and dancers),

I’d like to take a moment today to talk (write) about headshots (or, bodyshots for you dancer-types). You all need them. And you all get excited when you get a bunch of proofs for new headshots. And you all get excited when your friends post them on the facebook, so you can vote on which they should use. But sooo many of you seem perhaps to not get what headshots should be. If you have photographer friends who do headshots, please share this with them.

Your headshot needs to look like you...how you actually look when you go into an audition. I realize that having someone take beautiful, glamorous pictures of you that make you look amazing (or maybe those quirky “look how fun I am?” pictures), and which you put in front of your audition notebook and see before each audition and get to show everyone who might cast you...all that can be a great ego boost. I really do get it. It’s nice to think that you look amazing. But chances are, oh actor- and singer- and dancer-types, you are, in regular life, beautiful. And in your glamorous-looking headshots your beauty achieves a level of unreality.

But a director doesn’t need to see that. None of the people on the “other side of that table” need to see that. I’m a music director. I’ve been in lots of auditions, and not just over to the side playing the piano. I’ve am actively involved in making casting decisions, so I know what goes on, I know what’s said in those discussions. Waaayyy too many times I’ve heard someone say “what about this person”, and someone else says “who is that?”, and someone holds up a headshot, and someone else says “do they look like that”, and someone says “uh no, not really”, and someone else says “well, what did they look like?”.

Now, I tell you, folks, there is no need for that conversation. The reason you give us a headshot is so we who are trying to cast a show or fill a spot in a company or whatever you’re auditioning for can recall what you look like. We usually see lots of people in auditions, and we can’t always remember. So instead of a headshot that captures the most glamorous possible you, pick one that captures the typical audition-you. If we want to know that you can look glamorous and can’t imagine it in our heads, we can always call you back and ask you to glam up.

The glamorous headshot is great if you have a modeling portfolio. And if you have a buddy who takes pictures for you, it’s great that they can do that sort of thing. That’s what fashion photography is about, That’s what glamor photography is about. I say go ahead and get a couple of those kind of pics, to post on the facebook so your friends can say “wow you look so hot” and to look at daily to feel good and know that you are a beautiful person. But also get some real actor headshots. The more unusual the angle or position or lighting set up or make up required, the more likely the resulting photos aren’t gonna look like “normal” you.

Please, don’t give us the glamor shots. Don’t give us the 2 hairstyles ago pic. Don’t give us the 50 pounds ago pic. Don’t give us a pic more than a few years old. If you tend to alternate between two looks, then get headshots for both looks. For example: guys if you sometimes wear a beard, get bearded and clean-shaven headshots. If you absolutely need us to see you looking glamorous, then fine, get those headshots, but then also come to auditions looking that way. (Of course, chances are we’ll think that it’s kinda odd and maybe you’re crazy or something, and we won’t cast you.) And if you think that we need to see variety (the audition-you plus some other version)...don’t. We probably have at least a normal ability to imagine you in a different costume or hairstyle or makeup. Trust us a little.

Okay. That’s it. Maybe I’ve overdone it. Maybe I just needed to say “PEOPLE! Stop using those damn headshots that look like another person!” But I just like to go on, don’t I?

Monday, September 6, 2010

Forgive me

I’ve recently seen a couple of movies that have confessional scenes. I’ve never been in a confessional. I’m not Catholic. And being the critic I am of church and state and institutionalized control, I never cared for the idea of confession as a requirement in life. But I suddenly realize that maybe there’s something to it—something positive, something useful.

Maybe the act of revealing your shortcomings (I’m not comfortable with the word “sins”—it’s part of a whole mindset or belief system that I don’t want to participate in and to which I strongly object) to someone else can be healing. That’s sort of what (psycho) therapy is about, right?—you talking about your life and someone else, supposedly neutral about the whole thing, helping you see what’s good and what’s not.

I think confession is supposed to be anonymous. Again, I’m not Catholic, so I’m not completely sure. But if you always go to the same church it’s gonna be one of a few priests in there, right? Or maybe always the same guy. So not really anonymous. Some people may find comfort in that—confessing to the same person over and over. He can notice trends and warn against ongoing problems. But true anonymity would sometimes be a plus—you know, with the really shameful stuff.

Maybe we should all take turns confessing to each other. And forgiving each other. It just seems like that would have to be good on the whole.

experimenting

I just heard the phrase "experimenting with drugs" in a movie from 2001. I mention the year because it's not like something from the 60's or 70's. The phrase is probably still in use. The movie is Series 7: The Contenders. It's an interesting sort of commentary on TV violence and reality shows. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0251031/
Anyway, I'm thinking about that phrase "experimenting with drugs". But do people really experiment with drugs? Don't people just basically try drugs or take drugs (or continue to take drugs)? I'm not used to hearing about kids "experimenting" with cigarettes or alcohol or sex...well, maybe with homosexuality.
So if it's something that's legal or "the norm" for adults but undesirable for kids, then it's something kids get into, involved with, whatever. But if it's drugs or maybe homosexuality, then the kids are "experimenting"? Why the difference? Is it the hope on the part of parents or other adults that once the experiment is done, the behavior will stop, whereas drinking, smoking and straight sex are fine in the long run?

Friday, September 3, 2010

saving the world...or not

I just had a thought about saving the world and not saving the world.
Right-wing Christian fundamentalist types, who believe in the “literal word of the bible” (or it’s standard traditional interpretation) and all that jazz, have no incentive to reduce/reuse/recycle or reduce carbon emissions or conserve non-renewable resources or develop alternative energy sources or anything else that might allow life to continue on this planet. Nor have they any incentive to strive for peace among nations or any of the things that I would imagine a “reasonable” person to want in regard to sustaining life on this planet.
They’re too busy looking forward to the rapture, because they know it’s gonna happen in our time. So why should they bother? In fact, maybe they should do anything they can to hurry it along so they can all party in paradise with the Jesus…and the 72 virgins.
Wait, am I mixing my religions?

trailer

This morning I saw an appalling movie trailer. The movie is Machete. The trailer consisted mostly of a guy chopping off a bunch of people’s heads in various clips from the movie. It’s a real movie. I looked it up. There are other trailers that are “approved for appropriate audiences” (the green band previews) that are still pretty violent. But the one I saw this morning showed heads coming off and blades going into bodies, an explosion or two and a bare ass. (I hope it was a red band trailer… “mature audiences only”.)  It kept coming up as a 15-second ad before other videos.
I’m not generally squeamish about movie violence, but this was just violence…no context. I didn’t know if this was a good guy violently avenging wrong, saving the lives of innocents, whatever OR some crazy psycho bad guy just killing people for kicks. Now, having looked at one of the other trailers, I have some idea of the context. And this first trailer I saw was probably a compilation of the most violent 15 seconds from throughout the movie. So it’s not just a feature-length film full of creative beheadings.
It was truly disturbing, especially because it kept coming up every time I tried to watch some other video. I’m not a fan of censorship, but if you’re gonna do it (and we do) that sort of glorification of violence has got to be more damaging than a graphic realistic-looking sex scene, which I’ve rarely seen in a commercial movie and never in a trailer. Who would put together a trailer like that? Who is the target audience? Seriously, whatthefuck!?

Sunday, August 29, 2010

The so-so Lebowski

I watched The Big Lebowski last night. I'd seen at least some of it before, but I think I didn't make it through it. I guess I just didn't get it. I didn't find any of the characters likable or interesting. The dialogue seemed as if it was trying to be witty and clever, but I didn't find it so. Well, John Turturro's character was kinda interesting. And he perhaps the only funny line in the movie: "...Nobody fucks with the Jesus." And it's not all that funny. Ostensibly the movie is a comedy.
It was playing somewhere in town "on the big screen". I know a few folks who went, but I didn't. I watched it at home instantly on the netfix. I remember not liking it especially when I watched (part of) it before, so I had no interest in going out and paying money to watch something I don't really care for while surrounded by people who love it, who have this reverence for it, like it's such a great film and somehow deep and meaningful.
I gave it 2 stars, meaning "I didn't like it". I give most things I watch on the netflix 2, 3, or 4 stars. 1 star means it was awful and I couldn't get through it. 5 stars means I loved it and would watch it again several times (not right away; that would be an extremely rare thing). Movies like Glory, The Shawshank Redemption, Driving Miss Daisy...you know, anything with Morgan Freeman...those get 5 stars. Okay, just kidding about Morgan Freeman, although I usually love him. I think I give 5 stars more often than 1, but I'm sure there are lots of 1-star-worthy movies that I'd never even consider watching long enough to give it a star.
Now I'm curios to see exactly what all I've given a 5 star rating. Maybe I'll check it out and make a list. I'm a little crazy like that.
Anyway...
My feeling about The Big Lebowski is not unlike my feeling about Office Space, but I like Office Space a bit more. it might get 3 stars, which for me is not "I liked it" but rather "It's okay". I've heard people speak of Office Space like it could be this life-changing thing. It's not. It's sort of amusing. Of course, I've never worked in an office, so maybe I don't have the necessary background to truly appreciate it.
When I was in high school I worked a couple of summers at the Salvation Army Thrift Store. During college I worked 2 summers as a camp counselor and I worked a couple of semesters part-time sitting at a desk at a student center making sure people signed in and didn't do anything crazy while they were there. Other than that, as an adult, I've never had a "regular" sort of job: never worked in an office or a restaurant or a store; never answered phones or sold Amway products or had a internet business or anything like that; never even temped. Since college, actually it started while I was in college, I've made a living as a musician. I guess that's pretty rare. I have no interest in finding a "regular" job and have no obvious, practical experience if I wanted to apply for one. If I were injured somehow and couldn't play the piano anymore, I'd sort of be fucked. Also, I have no insurance, so I'd really be fucked.


I made a list.

5-star

An Inconvenient Truth
Camp
The Aristocrats
Knocked Up
Borat
Hedwig and the Angry Inch
Shortbus
Big Love: Season 1
This Film is Not Yet Rated
The Five Pennies
Hamlet 2
Rome: Season 2
Star Trek (the newest film)
Perfume: the Story of a Murderer
Spaced: The Complete Series
Blood Moon
10 Items or Less
The Office: Series 2 (BBC)
The Office Special (BBC)
The Office: Season 1 (US)
Dorothy Dandridge: An American Beauty
A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1968, royal Shakespeare Company)
I Love Sarah Jane
What Would Jesus Buy?
Weeds: Season 1
Heroes: Season 3
Earth 2 (TV series)
Coupling: Season 1, 2 & 3
Regarding Henry
Grease 2
Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Auschwitz: Inside the Nazi State (BBC documentary)
The League of Gentlemen: Series 1 (BBC)
The Celluloid Closet
Bill Cosby: Himself
The Education of Shelby Knox
My Favorite Year
Paper Clips (WATCH THIS)
The Comedians of Comedy: The Movie
Holiday Inn
Gentleman’s Agreement
Park
Walk hard: The Dewey Cox Story
Unbreakable
The Dark Crystal
Farscape: Season 1, 2 & 3
The Fifth Element
Eddie Izard: Dressed to Kill
Daniel Tosh: Completely Serious
Good Night, and Good Luck
Casablanca
The Glenn Miller Story
Sliders: Season 1 & 2 (went steadily downhill after that, if there’d been a Season 6: 1-star)
Dr. Strangelove
Godzilla (1998, Matthew Broderick)
Enemy Mine
The Color of Magic
Sex Drive
Chaplin: The Movie
Seven Pounds
Penelope
Arrested Development: Season 1 & 2
Better Off ted: Season 1
The IT Crowd: Series 1 & 2
Kidnapped (series)
A Clockwork Orange
The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
WALL-E
Dune
The Guild: Season 1, 2 & 3
Avatar: The Last Airbender: (the series…really great, and I’m not an anime fan)
Pushing Daisies: Season 1
Skins: Volume 1
Spartacus: Blood and Sand
Sweet Land

I rated these 5-star, but probably shouldn’t have
Little Miss Sunshine
The F-Bomb: A Documentary (I don’t even remember this)
The Producers (that has to be wrong)
100 Girls


1 star
Vegas in Space
Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter
Delta of Venus
The Last Kennedy
Babylon 5: The Lost Tales
Day of Wrath
Specimen
Drew Hastings: Irked and Miffed
Sizzle Beach, USA (early Kevin Costner)
The Breakup Artist
Vampires Anonymous
Sinners
Cyber Wars
Girls will Be Girls
Nature’s grave
The Girlfriend Experience
Warlock
House of Voices
The Beach Party at the Threshold of Hell
Flesh for Frankenstain
Ratko: The Dictator’s Son
Severed: Forest of the Dead
Rampage
The Devil’s Tomb
Life Blood
Thr3e

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

If I was a sculptor…but then again, no

Often lately when I’m writing it feels like I’m sculpting. I’ve never sculpted. Well, maybe I did in some elementary school art class, but who can remember that? Not me. I don’t know how to sculpt. But this feeling I have lately is what I imagine sculpting to be like. It may happen when I’m working on a big script or, more likely, when I’m composing.

The feeling is that of having a big chunk of material that I’m chipping away at to create something. I don’t mean I’m literally looking at all the possible words or notes that I could use, then I eliminate the ones I won’t use until I have a speech or melody. It’s more that I have a certain amount of material that I have to write, and I chip away at it little by little as I write more and more.

With a script, it’s a result of the “pre-writing” I do. My first major step with a new piece is to write a lot about the idea, the characters, the story, etc. So by the time I start writing the first real draft, I already know the story, the scenes are, what happens in each; if it’s a musical I know where the songs happen, what they’re about, who sings them, and what basic type each song is: ballad; up-tempo; charm song; something dancy. I may not know exactly how long the piece will end up being, but I know I have certain things I’ll have to write before I have a complete draft of the script. That doesn’t mean I don’t find new ideas or surprises as I write. I do, and I embrace them, and they sometimes lead to great things.

I’ve tried writing the other way: starting with a blank page and some germ of an idea; supposedly discovering what it’s all about as I write it. But it seems to produce a confused jumble of a piece that I have a hard time making sense of. It’s not a very satisfying process for me. I think I have a strong left- and right-brain: I’m organized and creative. In those quizzes you can take that show a result of a brain with a spot somewhere representing where you fall on the left-brain/right-brain thing, my result is almost right in the center, on more than one test. So I think my pre-writing method satisfies both hemispheres, both tendencies.

I don’t really pre-write music in that same way. However, since all I really write anymore is songs and other material for musicals, I always have the framework of lyrics and character and dramatic situation. Often as I write music, the lyrics will change, sometimes a little and sometimes a lot, but the basics—subject matter, character, situation— generally stay.

 The sculpting feeling is even stronger with the music. Although I often have (sometimes very clear) ideas of what the music will sound like as I’m writing lyrics, I generally don’t really work on the music until I have a good draft of the script done. So just like with the pre-writing and the script, I know when I start on the music that I have a certain amount of things I have to write before I have a complete draft of the score. So in the larger sense, I’m chipping away at the score, song by song, and with each song I’m chipping away at it, section by section, phrases by phrase, occasionally even note by note.

So, today I will return to sculpting. I’ve been working for a while this summer on a new show. I’ve written a lot this summer: a 10-minute play; a 10-minute musical; another play and a musical each about 15 minutes or so; a one-act play which I think is done, for now anyway; a one-act musical for a young audience (first draft of script done, needs a lot of work, more story development—guess I didn’t do enough pre-writing—no music yet); and this musical I’m focusing on now—a long one-act, an hour, maybe 70 minutes or so. If I really work at it the rest of this week and next, I could have a mostly complete draft of the score soon.